John Walter @ HOME, Manchester
GDLP
Emoji summary: š¦š©š£
itās too early in the year to be having to write a review like this !! why does everything have to b so problematic. Iām just tryin to live my life n u lot keep interruptin !
hi. Last week I went to Manchester to see the sights and everything was going fiiine; the martin parr show at manchester art gallery was genuinely a pleasure, didnt even know who the lad was; I finally went to the centre for chinese contemporary art, long time overdue; and eee I even got off the train early at Deansgate to visit Castlefield only to find it was still in christmas hibernation hours (and thats my own fault for not bothering to check the website buuuut it was fine, i just played a lot of pokemon go walking between galleries and hatching my eggs). ANYWAY. last on the schedj was artist John Walterās show at HOME and I know you all love his work but Iām here to ask in the next few hundred words: for why?
John Walter is a white british artist whose work is probably best known for engaging with the science, stigma and representation of HIV in these super bright sweet shop glue gun sentimental logo presentations. He creates full colour image-objects, installations and completely outfitted films. Big scale. the type of work you enter, move ur body around, confront. Fun for kids and fun for instagram-content-needers. I guess I have answered why people like the work but if u havenāt got a picture of it yet imagine Rachel Maclean, Ryan Trecartin, Eddie Peake and a british manās awkwardness in a blender. Iām all for LGBT+ content and research but this is where my mouth gets messy because I want to ask if Walterās practice is protected because of his subject? stick w me. I only ever see celebration of his work and all without question. thereās no real engaged critique that stress-tests what heās trying to do (onlineeee. as if I read anything offline, what am I, rich?). And thatās a noted silence when Iām walking around these sticky rooms in HOME confused by the aesthetic he has chosen to speak in t b h because it is such a direct appropriation of Australian Aboriginal image composition that Iām like :O really, does no one have a problem with this? yea go ahead and make work that illustrates cell structures and processes, iām not necessarily going to give a shit, but why do it in an aesthetic that has nothing to do with you? itās not right, it doesnāt make sense, doesnāt help the work in any way, doesnāt make things clearer, n it doesnāt compare to the level artists like Clifford Possum Tjapaltjarri, Minnie Pwerle, Rover Thomas or Judy Watson Napangardi were working at. heās putting their style on like a costume but heās !white! This jigsaw of bad dot-art with polo shapes is a caricature, unconvincing, bitter. itās katy perryās geisha performance, taking something real and purposeful for the ease of sum quickly served pop song visuals. And i could say this in many different ways but I mostly want to know y from the artist himself: why appropriate? why not find ur own essential style?
gotta also add that after the show I was none the wiser with regards to HIV. The press release said work in this exhibition was ābringing new scientific knowledge about viral capsids to the attention of the wider publicā but that knowledge was so obscured in visual dress-up that I didnāt learn anything. i was speaking to my friend tom doubtfire about this issue of artists trying 2 deliver ~information~ and he put it well when he said some artists flex knowledge in a way that means theyāre not even letting other people access it; they keep it to themselves by re-abstracting the piece of info theyāre supposed to be relaying to the audience. Too true of this show!! trips up on its purpose because itās self-conscious and trying to make sure it looks nice, grabbing clothes from other peopleās wardrobes at random. just becomes extra uninteresting when you realise itās not individual.
to finish, the effect as a whole was like maximalism to the point of boredom. the new HOME film commission āA Virus Walks Into A Barā was much too heavy on its Cool Arty Film handling - the edits, even the basic beat soundtrack, abrupt ending, quirky script and how slowly and out of normal human time the lines were delivered. i was squirmin. the only thing i enjoyed was the costume with millions of buttons stitched onto it because of how nice the button section is in a haberdashery. really hope john walter enlightens us all anyway. he has a good platform from which to change and maybe Iām fully missing the point and heās not even british and his website bio is wrong. we shall see.